CHAPTER 9

 

Leisure Thermal Comfort

In-The-Sun

 

 

W

e  have, thus far, concentrated on PMVSHADE – and have ignored direct and reflected sun rays. Such avoidance of direct solar influence was motivated by three considerations:

 

  • Much of our prior focus was directed to the summer season – which is a popular time for vacations, tours and visits – and during this season, climate within many regions of the United States, especially in the lower latitudes, is hot and humid. For these reasons, conditions in the shade were emphasized.

    PMVSHADE applies to each of the three temperature conditions, MAXTMP, MINTMP and AVETMP.

(On the other hand, PMVSUN applies only to the MAXTMP condition.)

  • Estimating PMVSUN for any region and season depends on the counterpart value for PMVSHADE. Thus, the previous information base for PMVSHADE lays the groundwork for our PMVSUN estimations.

 

  Whereas estimating PMVSHADE indices involves looking at a table, estimating PMVSUN indices requires a four-function calculator. This extra effort is worthwhile because the boundaries of midday thermal comfort can be pushed back and expanded. The warming effect of solar rays often converts otherwise chilly regions into midday comfort paradises. Thus, PMVSUN estimates can enable us to identify those off-season opportunities that do not seem obvious.

 

Simple Formula for Calculating PMVSUN

We previously used the term MRTSHADE to represent a fictitious enclosure whose sides are all at the same temperature as the air. Depending on time of day, MAXTMP, MINTMP and AVETMP were used as functional synonyms for MRTSHADE.

 

  On the other hand, MRTSUN applies only to the MAXTMP condition – approximately 3:00 PM local standard time.

In this book, we estimate values of MRTSUN by referring to one of four seasonal charts* (see Figures 9-2 through 9-5, pages 180-183).

 

  The formula for calculating PMVSUN is shown below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regression Equation for MAXTMP Conditions

 

PMVSUN  = -7.40222 + .598822 x PMVSHADE

+ 0.094754 x MRTSUN

                                                                              (Equation 9-1)

 

(99.96% of error in PMVSUN Index is explained by the two independent variables, utilizing fifty-five sets of data points.)

 

 
 

 


Step-By-Step Calculation of PMVSUN Indices

As explained below, the PMVSUN index is computed in three stages. In essence, this calculation enables us to convert an environment of shade into an environment of sun. We do this by adding the influence of solar energy (MRTSUN) to our outdoors thermal comfort index (PMVSHADE).

 

  Remember, PMVSHADE implies that mean radiant temperature is equal to ambient air temperature. PMVSUN implies an additional heat load due to solar radiation.

 

First Step: Select a PMVSHADE Index

We select a PMVSHADE thermal com–fort index from one of the preceding tables discussed in Chapters 4 through 8, for a region and season of interest.

 

  Example: select the PMVSHADE value of  -1.86” for San Francisco in October (see Table 5-2, page 69). (This value is also included in Table 9-1, page 176.)

 

  Notice that the starting value of PMVSHADE for October

(“-1.86”) is uncomfortably cold. Direct solar rays will change this for the better.

 

Second Step: Estimate an MRTSUN Value

Refer to Figures 9-2 through 9-5 (pages 180-183)  and visually estimate an MRTSUN (black globe temperature) value for specific localities. In these figures, the contour lines (MRTSUN isotherms) appear coarsely spaced, but usually they are adequate for our purposes. We make a best estimate of MRTSUN by estimating between any two adjacent contour lines.

 

  Example: for San Francisco in October, consult Fig–ure

9-5, page 183, and find the approximate value “90” for MRTSUN (also known as solar black globe temperature). (For San Francisco, this value is included within Table 9-2, page 177.)


“PMVSHADE  implies that mean radiant temperature is equal to ambient air temperature. PMVSUN implies an additional heat load due to solar radiation.”


 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Third Step: Use Regression Equation

To Compute PMVSUN

Use Fanger-based regression equation to cal–culate estimated value for the PMVSUN in–dex.

 

Example: Using previous values, in boldface below:

 

PMVSUN = 0.01 = -7.40222 + 0.598822 x -1.86

+ 0.094754 x 90

            


Text Box:  Exposure to Sun at Midday

We can appreciate the word “leisure”  – in “leisure thermal comfort”  – when we are exposed to direct sun during the summer.

 


 

 

 

 Thus, our predicted (derived from regression equation) PMVSUN value of “0.01” compares closely* with the Fanger-calculated value of “-0.01” (see “San Francisco” in Table 9-3, page 178).  

 

Off-Scale Thermal Comfort Indices Fall Into the Heat Stress Domain

Calculated values of PMVSHADE and PMVSUN in excess of “+4.0” (corresponding to unusually hot and humid July conditions within the United States) are mathematically undefined; accordingly, these were suppressed from the mathematical regression equation (boxed Equation 9-1, page 173).

 

  Note: The regression equation plot of Figure 9-6, page 184, exhibits very satisfactory linearity even while incorporating out-of-range PMV values up to “+4.0” (and likewise the large range of values less than “-3”).

 

  In Tables 9-1 through 9-3, high off-scale PMV values greater than “+4” are highlighted by light grayscale. Such off-scale high PMV values fall into the heat stress domain.

 

  Detailed discussion of heat stress is beyond the scope of this book and for such discussion the reader is referred to Gulf Weather Corporation’s document, which displays easy-to-use heat stress contour maps for the northern and southern hemispheres. An elementary discussion of heat stress is provided in Appendix 2. ■

 

 


TABLE 9-1: MRTSHADE AND PMVSHADE AT MAXTMP (MIDDAY) FOR “KEY” CITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PMVSHADE

 

 

 

MRTSHADE (MAXTMP)

THERMAL COMFORT

 

STATE

CITY

JAN

APR

JUL

OCT

JAN

APR

JUL

OCT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AZ

PHOENIX

66

84

105

88

-2.82

0.76

5.04

1.60

 

CA

LOS ANGELES

65

68

75

74

-2.95

-2.28

-0.72

-1.01

 

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

56

64

71

70

-4.77

-3.13

-1.64

-1.86

 

DC

WASHINGTON, D.C.

43

67

88

69

-7.54

-2.57

1.93

-2.09

 

FL

MIAMI

76

83

89

85

-0.55

0.91

2.27

1.42

 

GA

ATLANTA

52

73

89

73

-5.66

-1.29

2.16

-1.25

 

HI

HONOLULU

80

82

87

86

0.32

0.72

1.74

1.57

 

IL

CHICAGO

29

58

84

63

-10.43

-4.42

1.09

-3.36

 

LA

NEW ORLEANS

61

78

90

79

-3.74

-0.14

2.48

0.07

 

MN

DULUTH

16

48

76

53

-13.10

-6.51

-0.60

-5.45

 

MO

ST. LOUIS

39

67

89

69

-8.36

-2.55

2.12

-2.11

 

NE

OMAHA

31

63

88

66

-10.02

-3.40

1.91

-2.76

 

NY

NEW YORK

38

60

85

65

-8.57

-4.01

1.31

-2.91

 

TX

DALLAS

55

76

96

79

-5.05

-0.64

3.45

-0.03

 

UT

SALT LAKE CITY

37

62

92

66

-8.78

-3.64

2.36

-2.82

 

WA

SEATTLE

45

57

75

60

-7.08

-4.60

-0.84

-3.93

 

 

 

 

Text Box: PMV indices greater than “+4.0” (see grayscale highlighted values in table) and related MRT values are excluded from the boxed Fanger-based regression equation, page 173.



 

TABLE 9-2: MRTSUN AND PMVSUN AT MAXTMP (MIDDAY) FOR “KEY” CITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PMVSUN

 

 

MRTSUN

FANGER  INDICES

STATE

CITY

JAN

APR

JUL

OCT

JAN

APR

JUL

OCT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AZ

PHOENIX

90

110

130

110

-0.64

3.48

8.10

3.97

CA

LOS ANGELES

83

100

115

100

-1.35

0.74

3.31

1.51

CA

SAN FRANCISCO

70

90

100

90

-3.61

-0.78

1.13

-0.01

DC

WASHINGTON, D.C.

63

84

115

89

-6.00

-1.03

4.86

-0.24

FL

MIAMI

90

105

120

105

0.79

3.18

5.70

3.51

GA

ATLANTA

75

90

120

97

-3.76

0.31

5.58

1.05

HI