CHAPTER 11

 

MINTMP Correlation With Dew Point Temperature

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T

his chapter reviews climate data, collected from 303 U.S. cities, that indicate a relatively strong correlation between MINTMP and dew point temperature. This correlation is more obvious if cities whose average monthly precipitation (PRECIP) is less than 3.5 inches* are excluded from the database.

 

Influence of PRECIP on Dew Point and MINTMP Temperature Correlations

Table 11-1, page 195, shows two correlations between dew point temperature and MINTMP (average monthly minimum temperature).

  The first correlation within this table disregards PRECIP as a variable; nevertheless, the sample linear correlation coefficient for July (lowest correlation of all months) is about 80%.

 

  The second correlation reduces the statistical database by omitting cities whose PRECIP is less than 3.5 inches; the sample linear correlation coefficient for July then rises to about 96%.

 

  The correlation for July is consistently the lowest of the twelve months. Perhaps this observation relates to the fact that July is the hottest month in the United States. The sample linear correlation coefficient tends to increase on either side of July.

 

Another Look at PRECIP Influence

Table 11-2, pages 196-205, shows climate data for July, sorted by PRECIP. In this table, monthly PRECIP values range from “0.0” to “10.2.” By comparing the PRECIP and dew point temperature columns (highlighted by grayscale), while moving down the table, two trends become obvious, namely:

  • From the top of Table 11-2 (at 0.0 inches of PRECIP) to the middle of the table (at PRECIP just short of 3.5 inches), we see an inconsistent matching relationship between dew point and average monthly minimum temperature.

  • For PRECIP of 3.5 inches or more, we see agreement between dew point temperature and MINTMP.

 

  The table suggests that PRECIP, when above a certain threshold, is a synergistic factor that improves the correlation be­tween dew point temperature and monthly PRECIP.

 

 

Dew Point Temperature and MINTMP

Are Analyzed for 303 Cities of the U.S.

Table 11-3, pages 206-215, displays the arithmetic differences between MINTMP (average monthly minimum tempera­ture) and dew point temperature, the latter subtracted from the former, for each month. This table is sorted by city and state.

 

  This table shows many instances when differences between dew point temperature and average monthly minimum temperature are close to zero.

 

  Accordingly, we may cautiously use Table 11-3, usually as a last resort, to estimate dew point temperature from an independently re­ported MINTMP. Not all weather stations report dew point temperature, but most weather stations report the MINTMP. In Chapter 10 (pages 186-187) we illustrate application of Table 11-3 to substitute MINTMP for dew point temperature while estimating PMVSHADE. ■

 



 

 

TABLE 11-1: INFLUENCE OF PRECIP ON DEW POINT TEMPERATURE AND MINTMP CORRELATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PRECIPI-TATION

CORREL-

ATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THRESHOLD

MEASURES

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

None

R2

0.952

0.936

0.926

0.870

0.785

0.673

0.647

0.700

0.802

0.876

0.998

0.930

 

rxy

0.976

0.968

0.962

0.933

0.886

0.820

0.804

0.835

0.895

0.936

0.999

0.964

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.5 Inches

R2

0.962

0.958

0.955

0.942

0.950

0.942

0.916

0.942

0.971

0.971

0.947

0.961

 

rxy

0.981

0.979

0.977

0.971

0.975

0.971

0.957

0.971

0.985

0.985

0.973

0.980

 


 

R2 implies the fraction of variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable(s).

 

In July, for example, 65% of variation in average monthly minimum temperature is explained by dew point temperature – regardless of average monthly precipitation (see first row of table, above).

But, if average monthly precipitation is at least 3.5 inches, then R2 increases to about 92% (see threshold equal to 3.5 inches in table above).

 

rxy, the Sample Linear Correlation Coefficient, is the square root of R2.

 “+1” represents strong positive correlation

 “-1” represents strong negative correlation

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 



TABLE 11-2: JULY AT A GLANCE – SORTED BY PRECIP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PRECIP

TEMPERATURE °F

THERMAL COMFORT INDICES

STATE

CITY

DEWPNT

MAXTMP

MINTMP

MAXTMP

MINTMP

AVETMP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CA

ALAMEDA NAS

0.0

54

71

56

-1.61

-4.64

-3.12

CA

BAKERSFIELD WSO AP

0.0

51

98

69

3.55

-2.05

0.75

CA

CHINA LAKE NAF

0.0

42

103

70

.

-1.95

1.25

CA

EL TORO MCAS

0.0

59

82

61

0.65

-3.55

-1.45

CA

FRESNO WSO AP

0.0

53

98

65

3.58

-2.83

0.37